Antigravity vs Cursor Pricing and Google Antigravity vs Cursor Cost for a 10-Developer Team

The short answer: for one developer, Antigravity and Cursor cost the same $20 a month (Google AI Pro is $19.99, Cursor Pro is $20). For a 10-developer team they split. Ten personal Google AI Pro plans cost $199.90 a month but come with no admin console, Antigravity through Gemini Enterprise starts at $300 a month with Google Cloud terms, and Cursor Teams costs $400 a month, or $320 billed annually. The bigger difference is overage: Antigravity can be set to stop at the quota, while Cursor Teams keeps working and bills on-demand usage by default.

Most Antigravity vs Cursor comparisons are feature essays written around Antigravity's November 2025 launch, when it was free and its only paid tier was a $249.99 Ultra plan. Google has since split Ultra into two tiers, opened a business route through Gemini Enterprise and moved Gemini CLI users onto Antigravity. Cursor moved every plan to usage pools with on-demand billing. Here is what each costs a US engineering team now, using Google's Antigravity pricing page, plans and models docs and Cursor's pricing page, all read on October 8, 2026.

Antigravity vs Cursor pricing plan by plan

The full Google ladder, including Google AI Plus, Cloud credits and which models each tier gets, is on our Google Antigravity pricing page. The Cursor side, including the token rate and Enterprise contract terms, is on our Cursor pricing page.

What a 10-developer team pays on each

Neither vendor publishes its allowance in tokens, so a fair comparison has to use each one's own multiples. Cursor Premium is 5 times a Standard seat and Google AI Ultra 5x is 5 times Pro, which makes those two the natural pair for heavy users. These are monthly list prices before any overage:

Over a year the middle row is the realistic case for most US teams: $4,318.80 on personal Antigravity plans against $5,376 on Cursor Teams with annual billing. The catch is the column header. Personal plans are cheaper because they are personal. There is no central invoice, no admin view of who is using what, and the code your developers send runs under terms derived from Google's consumer Terms of Service. Once a security review is involved, the comparison that counts is Gemini Enterprise against Cursor Teams, and there Antigravity still starts $2 to $10 a seat lower.

Plenty of US teams staff agent-heavy projects partly with contractors, and a growing share of fully remote developer roles now list the AI coding tools the hire is expected to bring. For a contractor who brings their own tool, a personal plan is the developer's cost, not yours. For employees writing company code, buy seats your admin controls.

How overage works on each, and why it matters more than the seat price

This is where the two tools behave in opposite ways. Antigravity on Google AI Pro or Ultra has a setting called AI Credit Overages. Set to Never, a developer who exhausts the five-hour quota simply waits for the refresh. Set to Always, Antigravity spends purchased AI credits, which Google says are consumed at Gemini Enterprise consumption pricing; users report packs from $24.99 for 2,500 credits. Free-tier users cannot buy credits at all.

Cursor Teams switches on on-demand usage by default. When a member uses up the third-party model pool, Cursor moves them to its own models, and if they keep picking Claude or GPT they continue at the provider's list API price plus Cursor's $0.25 per million token rate, billed monthly in arrears. Nothing stops until a spend limit does.

• If finance wants a fixed number, Antigravity on personal plans with overages set to Never is the most predictable bill of the two. The cost of that predictability is developer time spent waiting on a refresh.
• If developers must never be blocked, Cursor's default is closer to what you want, but set a team spend limit on day one. Cursor's own docs say daily agent users typically land at $60 to $100 a month in total usage on an individual plan.
• If you want both, Gemini Enterprise's managed overages with spend caps across API and subscription usage, or Cursor Enterprise's pooled precommitted usage, are the company-grade versions of each.

Models, editors and the company checklist

• Claude models. Antigravity includes Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 inside the Pro and Ultra quota, with a separate Claude and GPT quota pool. The Gemini Enterprise route serves Gemini models only. Cursor serves Claude, GPT and Gemini on every plan, paid at list API price, which makes heavy Claude use more expensive on Cursor and impossible on Antigravity Enterprise.
• Editors. Cursor is its own VS Code based editor. Antigravity is a desktop app (Antigravity 2.0), a standalone IDE, a CLI and extensions for VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains, Zed and Xcode. The standalone Antigravity IDE is not supported for enterprise deployments; the app, CLI and extensions are.
• Identity. Cursor Teams includes SAML and OIDC SSO. Antigravity through Gemini Enterprise signs in with a business account through SSO and supports Okta and other providers through Workforce Identity Federation.
• Billing route. Cursor sells only directly through cursor.com and authorizes no resellers. Antigravity for business bills through your Google Cloud account, which lets a team with a Google Cloud commitment spend it on coding tools rather than signing a new vendor.
• Your own keys. Antigravity does not support bring-your-own-key on personal plans. Cursor lets individuals add their own API keys for some models.

Which one should a US team buy?

• Buy Cursor Teams if your developers live in one editor, need Claude and GPT as well as Gemini, and you want SSO and central billing without a cloud contract. Start on Standard seats, set a spend limit, and move the few people whose on-demand spend passes $80 a month to Premium.
• Buy Antigravity through Gemini Enterprise if you already pay Google Cloud, need data residency or VPC Service Controls, and can live with Gemini models in the agent. It is the cheaper company seat and the only one of the two that can sit under an existing cloud commitment.
• Use personal Google AI Pro plans only for a small team or contractors working on non-sensitive code, with overages set to Never. It is the cheapest line on this page, and the least controlled.

If the shortlist is wider, our Kiro vs Cursor pricing comparison runs the same 10-developer math for AWS's editor, and the Cursor alternatives price comparison adds Claude Code, Codex and Windsurf.

The coding work neither tool should pay for

Both tools meter the work the agent does, so a pull request checklist review costs the same quota as building a feature. Reviewing every pull request, triaging new bug reports and keeping docs in step with the API are the jobs that quietly push developers from Pro to Ultra on Antigravity and into on-demand on Cursor.

Those jobs already exist as products. The coding agents in our agent catalog, including a pull request reviewer, a bug triager and a docs writer, connect to GitHub with permissions you can revoke and cost a flat price from $49 a month, with no credits and no rate limit. Price the recurring work there first, then size Antigravity or Cursor seats for the developers writing code.